Posts Tagged ‘horror’

"The Strain" book jacket

Guillermo DelToro and Chuck Hogan’s novel The Strain reclaims the vampire mythos from the fangless, flowery teen romance it has become with the Twilight stories, and does so with excessive, gory relish. About time!

The Strain — the first of an epic, apocalyptic trilogy — puts a stake through the heart of the sexy vegetarian vampire made popular by Twilight, and gets us back to what was so creepy about vampires in the first place: they are the undead. They are hijacked human forms, and their hunger is not sexual — it’s the “red-in-tooth-and-claw” variety that makes nature wild, ugly and terrifying.

Many of the novel’s tropes are familiar from post-modern vampire lore: vampirism is a disease (as in Blade); ancient tribes of the undead in league with human co-conspirators (as in Underworld); high-tech vampire-hunting techniques (as in… you get the idea). It also has much in common with the sprawling scope of Stephen King’s The Stand. But the familiarity of these narrative devices do not take away from the scary fun of the book, which you’ll plow through like a bag of potato chips.

But I’ll say it again: the best thing about this book is that it sounds a death knell for the sexy vampire, who has been annoying true horror fans since the reign of Anne Rice. Strigoi!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
If I Did It book jacket

If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer

  • Author: Goldman Family
  • Year: 2008
  • Publisher: Beaufort Books
  • ISBN: 0825305934

I felt a little dirty when I checked O.J. Simpson’s “[If] I Did It” from the library, but I just had to see how this weird, “non-confession confession” played out.

This was the manuscript that Harper Collins was going to publish, but withdrew after public outrage. The text was repeatedly checked over and approved by the killer himself, so it truly reflects his warped view on the whole affair.

He comes across as whiny, narcissistic and completely out of touch. He paints himself as an earnest guy trying to be mature with his increasingly crazy estranged wife — he never laid a finger on her, etc. etc. She was getting out of control, he was worried about the kids…

He yammers on like this forever, until we get to the “night in question”, where he does indeed confess, but only after declaring that the description was “hypothetical”. He makes the jump from concerned goodguy to psychotic knife-murderer with jarring celerity; it’s obvious he left out many of the details that led to the brutal slashing. He leaves out the actual physical details of the massacre, claiming that he blacked out. He awakened from this lost time to discover he was covered in blood and holding the weapon… the corpses laid out horrifically near him.

Simpson claims that he was accompanied by someone (called “Charles”), that he couldn’t have done it alone. But “Charles”’s weird, last-minute appearance in the narrative feels completely grafted; I suspect he is an invention of O.J.’s designed to deflect blame. (The ghostwriter felt the same way.)

Throughout the whole creepy story, O.J. is more worried about his image than his kids, and pathetically tries to elicit sympathy from the reader. He fumes over tiny inaccuracies in press reports and rails throughout about how wrong they all got it — they were calling him a serial abuser! Can you imagine that?!? Hey, I may have beheaded my wife, but the police were only called to the house TWICE, not six times…! It was this last inaccuracy that gave him the courage to put down the gun and not shoot himself during his Bronco escape. He wanted to fight to salvage his reputation, presumably so his kids will have the *precise* stats for his wife beating career.

He ends the book breezily, in essence saying (I paraphrase, of course) “hey, crimes of passion, eh? Funny old world, funny relationships, me and Nicole were one of the funniest…” He wants you to know he really loved that woman he killed.

As for the man he killed, he seemed pretty indifferent. Wrong place, wrong time — shit happens!

I felt less dirty after reading the foreword by the Goldman family, which describes their 15 year fight to get O.J. to pay up the $38 million he owes from the wrongful death suit. The Goldmans were able to prevent Simpson from profiting from the book; the proceeds go to their foundation rather than to a shady legal entity set up by O.J..

So read the book without guilt, or check it out from the library if you feel uncomfortable “monetizing” sensational crimes (I felt that way about “Disco Bloodbath” — something of a cottage industry sprung up around that ugliness).

oldman-dracula

Whitney Sorrow has struck upon the brilliant idea of posting the novel Dracula in blog format — each post corresponds chronologically with the journal entries and letters that make up the classic book.

Get over there now, it’s just getting started… May 7th is an early entry!

Link: Dracula “Feed”

smith-dynasty
Enough already from Will Smith, whose goody-two-shoes schtick is so tiresome and nauseating. He should be run off the screen for trying to sell that latter-day Jimmy Stewart-wannabe horseshit, over and over again.

What pushed me over this edge was learning that the Fresh Prince is producing a remake of “The Karate Kid”, starring one of his god-awful precocious offspring as Daniel-san (renamed “Dre” to provide the bland Disney-ghetto cred that Smith invented). But it doesn’t stop there — Jackie Chan will be playing Mr. Miyagi.

We should be concerned about the possibility of a Smith dynasty in Hollywood. Its bland horrors could stretch over generations, just like the Bushes….

[Hat tip to FILMDRUNK for breaking the awful, awful news.]

Ichi the Killer poster

Ichi the Killer (Unrated Edition) (2003)

We are definitely in a golden age of Japanese cinema. As I’ve blathered on about elsewhere, they have far surpassed the US in the Horror & Action genres. And, of course, they own the whole field of Anime.

Ichi the Killer is not for the faint of heart. It is monstrously gory… but the lavish blood n’ guts are in service to an exciting Yakuza-mystery plotline. (Unlike the odious Hostel, where the plot only acts as a “gore delivery device,” to paraphrase the tobacco industry.)

The Yakuza, with its elaborate rituals and laconic machismo, provides a far superior story device than the tired old American mafia does. The last word on the American “mob movie” was expertly delivered by Martin Scorsese in Goodfellas. That film showed the true suburban banality of modern mob violence. The irritating Sopranos simply ripped off Scorsese for its schtick, if you ask me. So stick a fork in the Italian mafia cliche… the Yakuza is the only original source for gangster movies these days.

And Takashi Miike is a great, perverted auteur. (He did Audition as well.)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]